|
Home
Native-American
Health
Science Fine
Arts
Conspiracy Theories & Facts
Poli-Sci. 101


If
Americans Knew What Israel Is Doing! VIDEO WAS CENSORED!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynWjYHP91gA
What Every
American Needs To Know About Israel/Palestine
http://ifamericansknew.org/

also from LRSANI
Sent: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:33:15 -0700
Subject: DAMAGE CONTROL: Obama, globalist C.F.R member?
Obama Town Hall Event (broadcast via WGAL,CNN), Lancaster, Penn. (MP3 audio file
attached) ...
enjoy!
Audience member: "It's been reported that youand your wife are in theglobalist
C.F.R., which is the
Council On Foreign Relations, and I'dlike to know if that is true ...."
Barack Obama: "Well, first of all ... uh ... I ... I'm ... I'm not ...uh ... the
... the Council On
Foreign Relations ... uh ... I don't knowif I'm a official member ... I've ...
I've spoken there
before ... uh... it basically is just a forum where a bunch of people talk
aboutforeign policy ...
uh, and ... so there's nothing ... uh ... there ...there's no official
membership, I don't have a
card ... er ... ya know... a special handshake or anything like that ... umm
..."
VOICE STRESS MEASUREMENT TEST: 4.9/5.0 (FAIL)
POLITICAL DOUBLESPEAK RATING: 10.0/10.0 (PASS)
OVERALL EUPHORIC-HYPNOTIC-ANESTHETIC EFFECT: 0.8/5.0 (FAIL)
DAMAGE CONTROL EFFICIENCY: 0.2/5.0 (FAIL)
=================================================================================================
The CFR is the American Branch of a society which originated in England,
and which believesthat national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule
established.CarrollQuigley, member of the CFR, from his book, Tragedy & Hope
"The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common they want to
bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States.
A second clique of international members in the CFR comprises the Wall Street international bankers and
their key agents. Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the
control of global government." -- Admiral Chester Ward, member of the CFR for16 years, former judge
advocate general of U.S. Navy
"Practically every lawyer, banker, professor, general, journalist and bureaucrat who has had any
influence on the foreign policy of the last six Presidents -- From Franklin Roosevelt to Richard
Nixon -- has spent some time in the Council on Foreign Relations, Inc. .... it usually means that you
are a partner in an investment bank or law firm-- with occasional trouble-shooting assignments in government.
You believe in foreign aid, NATO, and a bipartisan foreign policy.
You've been pretty much running things in this country for the last 25 years, and you know it." --John Franklin Campbell, NY Times, 9/20/71
"For the last three decades, American foreign policy has remained largely in the hands of men -- the
overwhelming majority of them Council members -- whose world perspective was formed in World War II
and in the economic reconstructions and military security programs that followed. . . " -- AnthonyLukas, NY Times, 11/21/71
"The CFR, as such, does not write the platforms of both political parties or select their respective
presidential candidates, or control U.S. defense and foreign policies. But CFR members, as
individuals, acting in concert with other individual CFR members, do." --Admiral Chester Ward,
former judge advocate general of U.S. Navy, CFR member
"The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its
slimy legs over our cities, states and nation. At the head is a small group of banking houses...This
little coterie...run our government for their own selfish ends. It operates under cover of a
self-created screen...seizes...our executive officers...legislative
bodies...schools...courts...newspapers and every agency created for the public protection.
former N.Y. Mayor,John Hylan
BarackObama/CFR/Bush bloodline Connection
http://youtube.com/watch?v=E0DoxrNCImI

Subj: Unfit to Represent Us
TAKE
A FEW MOMENTS AND READ THIS LETTER. THESE ARE
STRONG, POWERFUL AND COURAGEOUS WORDS COMING
FROM A RETIRED COLONEL,
AND READ WHAT
LINCOLN HAD TO SAY AT THE END. WOW!
33 Senators Voted Against English as America's
Official Language on June 6, 2007.
On Wed. 6 June 2007, Colonel Harry Riley, USA,
Ret. wrote:
Senators:
Your vote against an amendment to the
immigration Bill 1348.... to make English
America's official language is astounding.
And done on D-Day, no less, when we honor those
that sacrificed in order to secure the bedrock,
character and principles of America.
I can only surmise your vote reflects a
loyalty to illegal aliens
I don't much care where you come from. What your
religion is. Whether you're black, white, or
some other color...male or female......Democrat,
Republican or Independent..... But I do care
when you are a United States Senator
representing Citizens of America ...and Vote
against English as the official language of the
United States
Your vote reflects Betrayal. Political
Surrender. Violates Your Pledge of Allegiance.
Dishonors historical principle. Rejects
Patriotism. Borders on traitorous action and, in
my opinion, makes you unfit to serve as a
United States Senator...impeachment...
Recall........Or other appropriate action is
warranted, or worse.
Four of you voting against English as America's
Official Language are Presidential Candidates:
Senator
Biden, Senator Clinton, Senator Dodd and
Senator Obama.
Four Senators vying to lead America, but won't,
or don't, have the courage to cast a vote in
favor of English as America's Official Language
when 91% of American Citizens want English
officially designated as our language.
This is the second time in the last several
months this list of Senators have disgraced
themselves as 'political Hacks'.... Unworthy
as Senators and certainly unqualified to serve
as President of the United States .
If America is as angry as I am, you will
realize a backlash so stunning it will
literally 'rock you out of your socks'.......
And preferably totally out of the United States
Senate.
The entire immigration bill is a farce... Your
action only confirms this really isn't about
America.. it is about self-serving
politics......despicable at best. It has been
said: 'Never Argue with an Idiot...They'll drag
you down to their level!'
PRESIDENT ABRAHAM LINCOLN SAID: 'Congressmen
who willfully take actions during wartime that
damages morale and undermine the military are
saboteurs and should be arrested, quickly tried
and hanged!!!'
PLEASE KEEP THIS GOING AROUND THE UNITED STATES
UNTIL THE ELECTION IN NOVEMBER!
|

Filed under the "Can This
be True?"...... our Social Security - Interesting
Dark and best kept secrets about Our Social Security.
Many years ago in Seattle, two wonderful neighbors,
Elliott and Patty Roosevelt came to my home to swim on
a regular basis. They were a great couple full of
laughter and stories that today I continue to marvel
at. Both are now deceased, but their stories remain.
During the years of our friendship we had many, many
discussions about Elliott's parents (President Franklin D.
and Eleanor Roosevelt) and how his father and mother
never intended for the Social Security and Welfare
programs to turn out the way they are today. Elliott
used to say that if his parents returned to Earth and
saw what the politicians had done to their programs
they would have burned all of them in hell.
Here is a story I received today regarding the Social
Security Program and I immediately thought of
Elliott's comments. I Hope you will read
this and think about it.
_____________________________________________
Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social
Security (FICA) Program. He promised:
1.) That participation in the Program would be
completely voluntary,
2.) That the participants would only have to pay
1% of the first $1,400 of their annual
incomes into the Program,
3.) That the money the participants elected to put
into the Program would be deductible from
their income for tax purposes each year,
4.) That the money the participants put into the
independent "Trust Fund" rather than into the
General operating fund, and therefore, would
only be used to fund the Social Security
Retirement Program, and no other
Government program, and,
5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees
would never be taxed as income
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are
now receiving a Social Security check every month --
and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of
the money we! paid to the Federal government to "put
away" -- you may be interested in the following:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the
independent "Trust Fund" and put it into the
General fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically
controlled House and Senate.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax
deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social
Security annuities????
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the
"tie-breaking" deciding vote as President of the
Senate, while he was Vice President of the US .
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving
annuity payments to immigrants?
This is MY FAVORITE:
A: That's right! Jimmy Carter! And the Democratic Party of course!
Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65,
began to receive Social Security payments! The
Democratic Party gave these payments to them,
even though they never paid a dime into it!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then, after doing all this lying and thieving and violating
of the original contract (FICA), the Democrats
turn around and tell you that the Republicans
want to take your Social Security away!
And the worst part about it is uninformed
citizens believe it!
==========================================! ====
If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of
awareness will be planted and maybe changes will
evolve. Maybe not!.. many Democrats are awfully
sure of what isn't so!!
But it's worth a try. How many people can
YOU send this to?
Actions speak louder than bumper stickers.
Forward this E-mail to others so that they can
be informed of the truth.
"THE ONLY THING NEEDED FOR EVIL TO TRIUMPH IS FOR GOOD MEN TO DO NOTHING" EDMUND
BURKE
Thank you Dan VZ

Warrantless Gun Searches in Boston?

HOW LONG DO WE
HAVE? WAKE UP AMERICA
This is the most interesting things I've read
in a long time. The sad thing about it, you can see it coming. I
have always heard about this democracy countdown. It is
interesting to see it in print.
About the time our original thirteen states
adopted their new constitution in 1787, Alexander Tyler, a
Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh , had
this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000
years earlier:
'A democracy is always temporary in nature; it
simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A
democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters
discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public
treasury.
From that moment on, the majority always vote
for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public
treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally
collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by
a dictatorship.
The average age of the world's greatest
civilizations from the beginning of history has been about 200
years. During those 200 years, those nations always progressed
through the following sequence:
1. from bondage to spiritual faith
2. from spiritual faith to great courage
3. from courage to liberty
4. from liberty to abundance
5. from abundance to complacency
6. from complacency to apathy
7. from apathy to dependence
8. From dependence back into bondage.'
Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University
School of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota, points out some interesting
facts concerning the
2000 Presidential election:
Number of States won by: Gore: 19 Bush: 29
Square miles of land won by: Gore: 580,000 Bush: 2,427,000
Population of counties won by: Gore: 127 million Bush: 143
million Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by:
Gore: 13.2 Bush: 2.1 Professor Olson adds: 'In aggregate, the
map of the territory Bush won was mostly the land owned by the
taxpaying citizens of this great country. Gore's territory
mostly encompassed those citizens living in government-owned
tenements welfare...
Olson believes the United States is now
somewhere between the 'complacency and apathy phase' of
Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty
percent of the nation's population already having reached the
'governmental dependency' phase.
If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to
twenty million criminal invaders called illegals and they vote,
then we can say goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years.
Pass this along to help everyone realize just
how much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger
to our freedom.

From
the Oklahoma State Library...
Indian Affairs: Laws and Treaties
compiled by Charles J. Kappler



The Iroquois Constitution
The
United States Constitution
The
Liberty Committee.org
U.S.A.
The Republic
How You Lost It
Cracks in the
Constitution Part
1
by Stephen Lendman
"What Is The Lesson To Be Learned From The Holocaust?"
By Silvia Cattori

Read about the
CIA and the Media at...

Dialog with
Iranian President
Who are the 13 Most Corrupt Members of Congress?


Here’s another
good history lesson I wasn’t taught!
from Patcricia
The Founding Immigrants
By KENNETH C. DAVIS
Published: July 3, 2007
Dorset, Vt.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/03/opinion/03davis.html?em&ex=1183608000&en=44534d879e660d98&ei=5087%0A
A PROMINENT American once said, about immigrants, “Few of their children in the
country learn English... The signs in our streets have inscriptions in both
languages ... Unless the stream of their importation could be turned they will
soon so outnumber us that all the advantages we have will not be able to
preserve our language, and even our government will become precarious.”
This sentiment did not emerge from the rancorous debate over the immigration
bill defeated last week in the Senate. It was not the lament of some guest of
Lou Dobbs or a Republican candidate intent on wooing bedrock conservative votes.
Guess again.
Voicing this grievance was Benjamin Franklin. And the language so vexing to him
was the German spoken by new arrivals to Pennsylvania in the 1750s, a wave of
immigrants whom Franklin viewed as the “most stupid of their nation.”
About the same time, a Lutheran minister named Henry Muhlenberg, himself a
recent arrival from Germany, worried that “the whole country is being flooded
with ordinary, extraordinary and unprecedented wickedness and crimes. ... Oh,
what a fearful thing it is to have so many thousands of unruly and brazen
sinners come into this free air and unfenced country.”
These German masses yearning to breathe free were not the only targets of
colonial fear and loathing. Echoing the opinions of colonial editors and
legislators, Ben Franklin was also troubled by the British practice of dumping
its felons on America. With typical Franklin wit, he proposed sending
rattlesnakes to Britain in return. (This did not, however, preclude numerous
colonists from purchasing these convicts as indentured servants.)
And still earlier in Pennsylvania, the Scotch-Irish had bred discontent, as
their penchant for squatting on choice real estate ran headlong against the
colony’s founders, the Penn family, and their genteel notions about who should
own what.
Often, the disdain for the foreign was inflamed by religion. Boston’s Puritans
hanged several Friends after a Bay Colony ban on Quakerism. In Virginia, the
Anglicans arrested Baptists. But the greatest scorn was generally reserved for
Catholics — usually meaning Irish, French, Spanish and Italians. Generations of
white American Protestants resented newly arriving “Papists,” and even in
colonial Maryland, a supposed haven for them, Roman Catholics were nonetheless
forbidden to vote and hold public office.
Once independent, the new nation began to carve its views on immigrants into
law. In considering New York’s Constitution, for instance, John Jay — later to
become the first chief justice of the Supreme Court — suggested erecting “a wall
of brass around the country for the exclusion of Catholics.”
By 1790, with the United States Constitution firmly in place, the first federal
citizenship law restricted naturalization to “free white persons” who had been
in the country for two years. That requirement was later pushed back to five
years and, in 1798, to 14 years.
Then, as now, politics was key. Federalists feared that too many immigrants were
joining the opposition. Under the 1798 Alien Act — with the threat of war in the
air over French attacks on American shipping — President John Adams had license
to deport anyone he considered “dangerous.” Although his secretary of state
favored mass deportations, Adams never actually put anybody on a boat.
Back then, the French warranted the most suspicion, but there were other
worrisome “aliens.” A wave of “wild Irish” refugees was thought to harbor
dangerous radicals. Harsh “anti-coolie” laws later singled out the Chinese. And,
of course, the millions of “involuntary” immigrants from Africa and their
offspring were regarded merely as persons “held to service.”
Scratch the surface of the current immigration debate and beneath the posturing
lies a dirty secret. Anti-immigrant sentiment is older than America itself. Born
before the nation, this abiding fear of the “huddled masses” emerged in the
early republic and gathered steam into the 19th and 20th centuries, when
nativist political parties, exclusionary laws and the Ku Klux Klan swept the
land.
As we celebrate another Fourth of July, this picture of American intolerance
clashes sharply with tidy schoolbook images of the great melting pot. Why has
the land of “all men are created equal” forged countless ghettoes and intricate
networks of social exclusion? Why the signs reading “No Irish Need Apply”? And
why has each new generation of immigrants had to face down a rich glossary of
now unmentionable epithets? Disdain for what is foreign is, sad to say, as
American as apple pie, slavery and lynching.
That fence along the Mexican border now being contemplated by Congress is just
the latest vestige of a venerable tradition, at least as old as John Jay’s “wall
of brass.” “Don’t fence me in” might be America’s unofficial anthem of
unfettered freedom, but too often the subtext is, “Fence everyone else out.”
Kenneth C. Davis is the author of
“Don’t Know
Much About History: Everything You Need to Know About American History but Never
Learned.”

DEMOCRACY NOW!..NPR
   

downloadable content of August 7 & 8, 2007
Dear Friends, I heard this excellent speech by award-winning journalist and
documentary filmmaker
John Pilger yesterday, which I HIGHLY recommend your hearing (or, reading if you
don't have
high-speed internet) ...
Freedom Next Time: Filmmaker & Journalist John Pilger on Propaganda, the Press,
Censorship and
Resisting the American Empire
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/07/130258
Read Transcript:
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/07/130258#transcript
Download MP3 Audio (Pilger segments at 11:50, again at 25:58 into broadcast):
http://www.archive.org/download/dn2007-0807/dn2007-0807-1_64kb.mp3 (27.04MB)
Quote:
"Impartiality [is] a principle .... to be suspended whenever the establishment
[is] under threat."
"A group of Russian journalists .... were touring the United States. On the
final day of their
visit, they were asked ... for their impressions. 'I have to tell you,' said the
spokesman, 'that
we were astonished to find after reading all the newspapers and watching TV day
after day that all
the opinions on all the vital issues are the same. To get that result in our
country we send
journalists to the gulag. We even tear out their fingernails. Here you don't
have to do any of
that. What is the secret?'"
".... members of the dissident group Charter 77 .... told me, 'In dictatorships
we are more
fortunate that you in the West in one respect. We believe nothing of what we
read in the newspapers
and nothing of what we watch on television, because we know its propaganda and
lies. Unlike you in
the West. We've learned to look behind the propaganda and to read between the
lines, and unlike
you, we know that the real truth is always subversive.'"
"... 'Never believe anything until it's officially denied.'"
Comments:
http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2006/06/comments-on-john-pilgers-n_115038012101904153.html
Quote:
"Those who see the seeds of fascism and disturbing similarities in the US (and
UK) today to Nazi
Germany .... and Hitler's demonic appeal to his divine mission as that country's
savior .... that
he sold to his people in Christian religious terms. He did it in a country that
was the pride of
Western civilization and a very model of democracy. If it can happen there, it
can anywhere and
will unless enough committed people work to prevent it."

Here is another broadcast segment of great interest ...
Norman Finkelstein & Former Israeli Foreign Minister Shlomo Ben-Ami Debate
Complete Transcript
http://www.democracynow.org/finkelstein-benami.shtml
Download MP3 Audio
http://www.archive.org/download/dn-finkelstein-benami/dn-finkelstein-benami_64kb.mp3
(42.05MB)
Quote:
"The Zionist enterprise [is] an enterprise of conquest .... by the intimidation
and at times
atrocities and massacres it perpetrated against the civilian Arab community.”

The Bottled Water Lie: As Soft Drink Giant Admits Product is Tap Water, New
Scrutiny Falls on the
Economic and Environmental Costs of a Billion Dollar Industry
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/01/1435240&mode=thread&tid=25
Read Transcript:
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/01/1435240&mode=thread&tid=25#transcript
Download MP3 Audio:
http://www.archive.org/download/dn2007-0801/dn2007-0801-1_64kb.mp3
Quote:
"The soft drink giant Pepsi has been forced to make an embarrassing admission –
its
best-selling Aquafina bottled water is nothing more than tap water. A
half-liter of Pepsi's
Aquafina .... costs $1.39. The bottle contains purified [tap] water from the
[local] water supply.
From the tap, you can pour over 6.4 gallons for a penny. That makes the bottled
stuff about 7,000
times more expensive, even though Aquafina is using the same source of water."
"The environmental impact of the country’s obsession with bottled water has been
staggering.
Each day an estimated 60 million plastic water bottles are thrown away. Most are
not recycled. The
Pacific Institute has estimated 20 million barrels of oil are used each year to
make the plastic for water bottles"
Thank you LRSANI


How did
Republicans pick the elephant, and Democrats the donkey, to represent their
parties? c-span

$$$$ZZZZ.....

'Security and Liberty'
by Congressman Ron Paul
How politicians ought to think and speak!!
... complete article is HERE;
http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2007/tst042307.htm
excerpt below;
"The Virginia Tech tragedy may not lead directly to more gun control, but I fear
it will lead to more people control. Thanks to our media and many government
officials, Americans have become conditioned to view the state as our protector
and the solution to every problem. Whenever something terrible happens,
especially when it becomes a national news story, people reflexively demand that
government do something. This impulse almost always leads to bad laws and the
loss of liberty. It is completely at odds with the best American traditions of
self-reliance and rugged individualism."
Ron Paul's home page is HERE;
http://www.house.gov/paul/
Thank you: LRSANI

DEMOCRACY NOW!
downloadable content

"They are laying the bricks one at a time for a police
state."
Domestic Use of Spy Satellites To Widen
Law Enforcement Getting New Access To Secret
Imagery; From the Washington Post


A Sad Goodbye....By Cindy Sheehan
Richard Dolan
"Through
the Keyhole"

Iraq Veterans Against the
War
"You
have
to check
out the...
Intervention
Magazine; War, Politics, Culture
The Illusion of Democracy....by Tibor Friedman
Planning
on voting?
check out this infernalpress.com,
article
Cutting-Edge, mind-opening
Documentaries from
"Why Hemp Became Illegal, and
Remains So"
new!
ocal
Point Publications
Are
we being brainwashed? A classic article by author Norman D. Livergood
From
Alternet.org...10 Appalling lies WeWere Told About Iraq....
www.notinourname.net
American
Friends Service
Committee
International
Answer-LA
Read
up on the global peace efforts going on right now...at the
"The
New Inquisition"
Walter Cronkite from the Denver Post
Have you ever wondered what happened to the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence?
Five signers were captured by the British
as traitors, and tortured before they died.
Twelve had their homes ransacked
and burned.
Two lost their sons serving in the Revolutionary Army; another
had two sons captured.
Nine of the 56 fought and died from wounds or
hardships of the Revolutionary War. They signed and they pledged their
lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor.
What kind of men were they? Twenty-four were lawyers and jurists. Eleven
were merchants, nine were farmers and large plantation owners; men of means,
well educated.
But they signed the Declaration of Independence knowing full
well that the penalty would be death if they were captured.
Carter Braxton of Virginia, a wealthy planter and trader, saw his ships
swept from the seas by the British Navy. He sold his home and properties to
pay his debts, and died in rags.
Thomas McKeam was so hounded by the British
that he was forced to move his family almost constantly. He served in the
Congress without pay, and his family was kept in hiding. His possessions
were taken from him, and poverty was his reward.
Vandals or soldiers looted
the properties of Dillery, Hall, Clymer, Walton, Gwinnett, Heyward,
Ruttledge, and Middleton. At the battle of Yorktown, Thomas Nelson, Jr.,
noted that the British General Cornwallis had taken over the Nelson home for
his headquarters. He quietly urged General George Washington to open fire.
The home was destroyed, and Nelson died bankrupt.
Francis Lewis had his home
and properties destroyed. The enemy jailed his wife, and she died within a
few months.
John Hart was driven from his wife's bedside as she was dying.
Their 13 children fled for their lives. His fields and his gristmill were
laid to waste. For more than a year he lived in forests and caves,
returning home to find his wife dead and his children vanished. A few weeks
later he died from exhaustion and a broken heart. Norris and Livingston
suffered similar fates.
Such were the stories and sacrifices of the American Revolution. These were
not wild-eyed, rabble-rousing ruffians. They were soft-spoken men of means
and education.
They had security, but they valued liberty more. Standing
tall, straight, and unwavering, they pledged: "For the support of this
declaration, with firm reliance on the protection of the divine providence,
we mutually pledge to each other, our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred
honor."
They gave you and me a free and independent America. The history
books never told you a lot about what happened in the Revolutionary War.
We didn't fight just the British. We were British subjects at that time and
we fought our own government! Some of us take these liberties so much for
granted, but we shouldn't. So, take a few minutes while enjoying your 4th of
July holiday, or any day, and silently thank these patriots. It's not much to ask for
the price they paid.

There are
actually assholes in this country that think the Constitution "is just a
goddamned piece of paper". (ed.)


Who are the 13
Most
Corrupt Members of Congress?

Home
Native-American
Health
Science Fine
Arts
Articles |