Sent:  Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:33:15 -0700
Subject: DAMAGE CONTROL: Obama, globalist C.F.R member?

Obama Town Hall Event (broadcast via WGAL,CNN), Lancaster, Penn. (MP3 audio file 
attached) ...
enjoy!

Audience member: "It's been reported that youand your wife are in theglobalist 
C.F.R., which is the
Council On Foreign Relations, and I'dlike to know if that is true ...."

Barack Obama: "Well, first of all ... uh ... I ... I'm ... I'm not ...uh ... the 
... the Council On
Foreign Relations ... uh ... I don't knowif I'm a official member ... I've ... 
I've spoken there
before ... uh... it basically is just a forum where a bunch of people talk 
aboutforeign policy ...
uh, and ... so there's nothing ... uh ... there ...there's no official 
membership, I don't have a
card ... er ... ya know... a special handshake or anything like that ... umm 
..."

VOICE STRESS MEASUREMENT TEST: 4.9/5.0 (FAIL)
POLITICAL DOUBLESPEAK RATING: 10.0/10.0 (PASS)
OVERALL EUPHORIC-HYPNOTIC-ANESTHETIC EFFECT: 0.8/5.0 (FAIL)
DAMAGE CONTROL EFFICIENCY: 0.2/5.0 (FAIL)

=================================================================================================


The CFR is the American Branch of a society which originated in England, 
and which believesthat national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule 
established.CarrollQuigley, member of the CFR, from his book, Tragedy & Hope

"The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common they want to
bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States. 

A second clique of international members in the CFR comprises the Wall Street international bankers and
their key agents. Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the
control of global government." -- Admiral Chester Ward, member of the CFR for16 years, former judge
advocate general of U.S. Navy

"Practically every lawyer, banker, professor, general, journalist and bureaucrat who has had any
influence on the foreign policy of the last six Presidents -- From Franklin Roosevelt to Richard
Nixon -- has spent some time in the Council on Foreign Relations, Inc. .... it usually means that you
are a partner in an investment bank or law firm-- with occasional trouble-shooting assignments in government.

 You believe in foreign aid,  NATO, and a bipartisan foreign policy.
You've been pretty much running things in this country for the last 25 years, and you know it." --John Franklin Campbell, NY Times, 9/20/71

"For the last three decades, American foreign policy has remained largely in the hands of men -- the
overwhelming majority of them Council members -- whose world perspective was formed in World War II
 and in the economic reconstructions and military security programs that followed. . . " -- AnthonyLukas, NY Times, 11/21/71

"The CFR, as such, does not write the platforms of both political parties or select their respective
presidential candidates, or control U.S. defense and foreign policies. But CFR members, as
individuals, acting in concert with other individual CFR members, do." --Admiral Chester Ward,
former judge advocate general of U.S. Navy, CFR member

"The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its
slimy legs over our cities, states and nation. At the head is a small group of banking houses...This
little coterie...run our government for their own selfish ends. It operates under cover of a
self-created screen...seizes...our executive officers...legislative 
bodies...schools...courts...newspapers and every agency created for the public protection.
former N.Y. Mayor,John Hylan

BarackObama/CFR/Bush bloodline Connection
http://youtube.com/watch?v=E0DoxrNCImI

"What Is The Lesson To Be Learned From The Holocaust?"

By Silvia Cattori

Read about the CIA and the Media at...

Dialog with Iranian President

Who are the 13 Most Corrupt Members of Congress?

Here’s another good history lesson I wasn’t taught!
from Patcricia

The Founding Immigrants

By KENNETH C. DAVIS

Published: July 3, 2007

Dorset, Vt.


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/03/opinion/03davis.html?em&ex=1183608000&en=44534d879e660d98&ei=5087%0A

A PROMINENT American once said, about immigrants, “Few of their children in the country learn English... The signs in our streets have inscriptions in both languages ... Unless the stream of their importation could be turned they will soon so outnumber us that all the advantages we have will not be able to preserve our language, and even our government will become precarious.”

This sentiment did not emerge from the rancorous debate over the immigration bill defeated last week in the Senate. It was not the lament of some guest of Lou Dobbs or a Republican candidate intent on wooing bedrock conservative votes. Guess again.

Voicing this grievance was Benjamin Franklin. And the language so vexing to him was the German spoken by new arrivals to Pennsylvania in the 1750s, a wave of immigrants whom Franklin viewed as the “most stupid of their nation.”

About the same time, a Lutheran minister named Henry Muhlenberg, himself a recent arrival from Germany, worried that “the whole country is being flooded with ordinary, extraordinary and unprecedented wickedness and crimes. ... Oh, what a fearful thing it is to have so many thousands of unruly and brazen sinners come into this free air and unfenced country.”

These German masses yearning to breathe free were not the only targets of colonial fear and loathing. Echoing the opinions of colonial editors and legislators, Ben Franklin was also troubled by the British practice of dumping its felons on America. With typical Franklin wit, he proposed sending rattlesnakes to Britain in return. (This did not, however, preclude numerous colonists from purchasing these convicts as indentured servants.)

And still earlier in Pennsylvania, the Scotch-Irish had bred discontent, as their penchant for squatting on choice real estate ran headlong against the colony’s founders, the Penn family, and their genteel notions about who should own what.

Often, the disdain for the foreign was inflamed by religion. Boston’s Puritans hanged several Friends after a Bay Colony ban on Quakerism. In Virginia, the Anglicans arrested Baptists. But the greatest scorn was generally reserved for Catholics — usually meaning Irish, French, Spanish and Italians. Generations of white American Protestants resented newly arriving “Papists,” and even in colonial Maryland, a supposed haven for them, Roman Catholics were nonetheless forbidden to vote and hold public office.

Once independent, the new nation began to carve its views on immigrants into law. In considering New York’s Constitution, for instance, John Jay — later to become the first chief justice of the Supreme Court — suggested erecting “a wall of brass around the country for the exclusion of Catholics.”

By 1790, with the United States Constitution firmly in place, the first federal citizenship law restricted naturalization to “free white persons” who had been in the country for two years. That requirement was later pushed back to five years and, in 1798, to 14 years.

Then, as now, politics was key. Federalists feared that too many immigrants were joining the opposition. Under the 1798 Alien Act — with the threat of war in the air over French attacks on American shipping — President John Adams had license to deport anyone he considered “dangerous.” Although his secretary of state favored mass deportations, Adams never actually put anybody on a boat.

Back then, the French warranted the most suspicion, but there were other worrisome “aliens.” A wave of “wild Irish” refugees was thought to harbor dangerous radicals. Harsh “anti-coolie” laws later singled out the Chinese. And, of course, the millions of “involuntary” immigrants from Africa and their offspring were regarded merely as persons “held to service.”

Scratch the surface of the current immigration debate and beneath the posturing lies a dirty secret. Anti-immigrant sentiment is older than America itself. Born before the nation, this abiding fear of the “huddled masses” emerged in the early republic and gathered steam into the 19th and 20th centuries, when nativist political parties, exclusionary laws and the Ku Klux Klan swept the land.

As we celebrate another Fourth of July, this picture of American intolerance clashes sharply with tidy schoolbook images of the great melting pot. Why has the land of “all men are created equal” forged countless ghettoes and intricate networks of social exclusion? Why the signs reading “No Irish Need Apply”? And why has each new generation of immigrants had to face down a rich glossary of now unmentionable epithets? Disdain for what is foreign is, sad to say, as American as apple pie, slavery and lynching.

That fence along the Mexican border now being contemplated by Congress is just the latest vestige of a venerable tradition, at least as old as John Jay’s “wall of brass.” “Don’t fence me in” might be America’s unofficial anthem of unfettered freedom, but too often the subtext is, “Fence everyone else out.”
Kenneth C. Davis is the author of

“Don’t Know Much About History: Everything You Need to Know About American History but Never Learned.”
 

DEMOCRACY NOW!..NPR

 downloadable content of August 7 & 8, 2007

Dear Friends, I heard this excellent speech by award-winning journalist and documentary filmmaker
John Pilger yesterday, which I HIGHLY recommend your hearing (or, reading if you don't have
high-speed internet) ...

Freedom Next Time: Filmmaker & Journalist John Pilger on Propaganda, the Press, Censorship and
Resisting the American Empire
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/07/130258

Read Transcript:
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/07/130258#transcript

Download MP3 Audio (Pilger segments at 11:50, again at 25:58 into broadcast):
http://www.archive.org/download/dn2007-0807/dn2007-0807-1_64kb.mp3  (27.04MB)

Quote:
"Impartiality [is] a principle .... to be suspended whenever the establishment [is] under threat."

"A group of Russian journalists .... were touring the United States. On the final day of their
visit, they were asked ... for their impressions. 'I have to tell you,' said the spokesman, 'that
we were astonished to find after reading all the newspapers and watching TV day after day that all
the opinions on all the vital issues are the same. To get that result in our country we send
journalists to the gulag. We even tear out their fingernails. Here you don't have to do any of
that. What is the secret?'"

".... members of the dissident group Charter 77 .... told me, 'In dictatorships we are more
fortunate that you in the West in one respect. We believe nothing of what we read in the newspapers
and nothing of what we watch on television, because we know its propaganda and lies. Unlike you in
the West. We've learned to look behind the propaganda and to read between the lines, and unlike
you, we know that the real truth is always subversive.'"

"... 'Never believe anything until it's officially denied.'"

Comments:
http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2006/06/comments-on-john-pilgers-n_115038012101904153.html

Quote:
"Those who see the seeds of fascism and disturbing similarities in the US (and UK) today to Nazi
Germany .... and Hitler's demonic appeal to his divine mission as that country's savior .... that
he sold to his people in Christian religious terms. He did it in a country that was the pride of
Western civilization and a very model of democracy. If it can happen there, it can anywhere and
will unless enough committed people work to prevent it."



Here is another broadcast segment of great interest ...

Norman Finkelstein & Former Israeli Foreign Minister Shlomo Ben-Ami Debate

Complete Transcript
http://www.democracynow.org/finkelstein-benami.shtml

Download MP3 Audio
http://www.archive.org/download/dn-finkelstein-benami/dn-finkelstein-benami_64kb.mp3  (42.05MB)

Quote:
"The Zionist enterprise [is] an enterprise of conquest .... by the intimidation and at times
atrocities and massacres it perpetrated against the civilian Arab community.”




The Bottled Water Lie: As Soft Drink Giant Admits Product is Tap Water, New Scrutiny Falls on the
Economic and Environmental Costs of a Billion Dollar Industry
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/01/1435240&mode=thread&tid=25

Read Transcript:
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/01/1435240&mode=thread&tid=25#transcript

Download MP3 Audio:
http://www.archive.org/download/dn2007-0801/dn2007-0801-1_64kb.mp3

Quote:
"The soft drink giant Pepsi has been forced to make an embarrassing admission – its
best-selling Aquafina bottled water is nothing more than tap water.  A half-liter of Pepsi's
Aquafina .... costs $1.39. The bottle contains purified [tap] water from the [local] water supply.
From the tap, you can pour over 6.4 gallons for a penny. That makes the bottled stuff about 7,000
times more expensive, even though Aquafina is using the same source of water."

"The environmental impact of the country’s obsession with bottled water has been staggering.
Each day an estimated 60 million plastic water bottles are thrown away. Most are not recycled. The
Pacific Institute has estimated 20 million barrels of oil are used each year to make the plastic for water bottles"

Thank you LRSANI

How did Republicans pick the elephant, and Democrats the donkey, to represent their parties? c-span

$$$$ZZZZ.....

 'Security and Liberty'

 by Congressman Ron Paul

How politicians ought to think and speak!!

... complete article is HERE;

http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2007/tst042307.htm

excerpt below;

"The Virginia Tech tragedy may not lead directly to more gun control, but I fear it will lead to more people control. Thanks to our media and many government officials, Americans have become conditioned to view the state as our protector and the solution to every problem. Whenever something terrible happens, especially when it becomes a national news story, people reflexively demand that government do something. This impulse almost always leads to bad laws and the loss of liberty. It is completely at odds with the best American traditions of self-reliance and rugged individualism."

Ron Paul's home page is HERE;

http://www.house.gov/paul/

Thank you: LRSANI

DEMOCRACY NOW! downloadable content

"They are laying the bricks one at a time for a police state."

Domestic Use of Spy Satellites To Widen
Law Enforcement Getting New Access To Secret Imagery; From the Washington Post

Iraq Veterans Against the War

Are we being brainwashed? A classic article by author Norman D. Livergood

From Alternet.org...10 Appalling lies WeWere Told About Iraq....

www.notinourname.net

American Friends Service Committee

International Answer-LA

Read up on the global peace efforts going on right now...at the

"The New Inquisition" Walter Cronkite from the Denver Post  

Have you ever wondered what happened to the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence?

Five signers were captured by the British
as traitors, and tortured before they died.

Twelve had their homes ransacked
and burned. 

Two lost their sons serving in the Revolutionary Army; another
had two sons captured.

Nine of the 56 fought and died from wounds or
hardships of the Revolutionary War. They signed and they pledged their
lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor. 

What kind of men were they? Twenty-four were lawyers and jurists. Eleven
were merchants, nine were farmers and large plantation owners; men of means,
well educated. 

But they signed the Declaration of Independence knowing full
well that the penalty would be death if they were captured.

Carter Braxton of Virginia, a wealthy planter and trader, saw his ships
swept from the seas by the British Navy. He sold his home and properties to
pay his debts, and died in rags.

Thomas McKeam was so hounded by the British
that he was forced to move his family almost constantly. He served in the
Congress without pay, and his family was kept in hiding. His possessions
were taken from him, and poverty was his reward.

Vandals or soldiers looted
the properties of Dillery, Hall, Clymer, Walton, Gwinnett, Heyward,
Ruttledge, and Middleton. At the battle of Yorktown, Thomas Nelson, Jr.,
noted that the British General Cornwallis had taken over the Nelson home for
his headquarters. He quietly urged General George Washington to open fire.
The home was destroyed, and Nelson died bankrupt.

Francis Lewis had his home
and properties destroyed. The enemy jailed his wife, and she died within a
few months.

John Hart was driven from his wife's bedside as she was dying.
Their 13 children fled for their lives. His fields and his gristmill were
laid to waste. For more than a year he lived in forests and caves,
returning home to find his wife dead and his children vanished. A few weeks
later he died from exhaustion and a broken heart. Norris and Livingston
suffered similar fates.


Such were the stories and sacrifices of the American Revolution. These were
not wild-eyed, rabble-rousing ruffians. They were soft-spoken men of means
and education. 

They had security, but they valued liberty more. Standing
tall, straight, and unwavering, they pledged: "For the support of this
declaration, with firm reliance on the protection of the divine providence,
we mutually pledge to each other, our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred
honor."

They gave you and me a free and independent America. The history
books never told you a lot about what happened in the Revolutionary War.

We didn't fight just the British. We were British subjects at that time and
we fought our own government! Some of us take these liberties so much for
granted, but we shouldn't. So, take a few minutes while enjoying your 4th of
July holiday, or any day, and silently thank these patriots. It's not much to ask for
the price they paid.

There are actually assholes in this country that think the Constitution "is just a goddamned piece of paper". (ed.)

Who are the 13 Most Corrupt Members of Congress?

Home  Native-American  Health  Science  Fine Arts   Articles